Comments on: Google Slashes MuscleHack’s PageRank! http://www.musclehack.com/google-slashes-musclehacks-pagerank/#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=google-slashes-musclehacks-pagerank Free Weight Training Programs - How To Build Muscle Fast Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:42:09 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Rich http://www.musclehack.com/google-slashes-musclehacks-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-20299 Rich Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:58:29 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=662#comment-20299 Hi Mark, Google looks at link "quality" and this can be more important than quantity of links, as the google spiders are trying to check for "spam" sites (not suggesting yours is BTW!!) which try to fool the spiders. This can come from comments at the end of articles, URLs in user names, etc as much as anything else, though the TextAds will surely be the main culprit. Avoid un-regulated links at all costs! You could try introducing the "nofollow" attribute to link tags which you have not personally verified for quality. This stops the Google spiders using the link in their page rank calculation. This feature was introduced by Google for exactly this purpose. Cheers, and good luck! Rich Hi Mark,

Google looks at link “quality” and this can be more important than quantity of links, as the google spiders are trying to check for “spam” sites (not suggesting yours is BTW!!) which try to fool the spiders. This can come from comments at the end of articles, URLs in user names, etc as much as anything else, though the TextAds will surely be the main culprit.

Avoid un-regulated links at all costs! You could try introducing the “nofollow” attribute to link tags which you have not personally verified for quality. This stops the Google spiders using the link in their page rank calculation. This feature was introduced by Google for exactly this purpose.

Cheers, and good luck!
Rich

]]> By: Mark McManus http://www.musclehack.com/google-slashes-musclehacks-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-15063 Mark McManus Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:13:32 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=662#comment-15063 Yeah definitely. Well. I've played my part now. Yeah definitely. Well. I’ve played my part now.

]]> By: SupplementPricing.com http://www.musclehack.com/google-slashes-musclehacks-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-15062 SupplementPricing.com Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:12:09 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=662#comment-15062 It seems like lately Google has been running a pretty stiff campaign against paid links, and TextLinkAds definitely falls into that category. Pretty lame I agree! It seems like lately Google has been running a pretty stiff campaign against paid links, and TextLinkAds definitely falls into that category. Pretty lame I agree!

]]> By: Benjamin Teal http://www.musclehack.com/google-slashes-musclehacks-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-15044 Benjamin Teal Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:25:48 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=662#comment-15044 Hey Mark. Yeah, Google can be a tricky animal sometimes. At the end of the day, however, I agree that the Google Beast feeds on quality content, so just keep feeding it (and your readers) what it wants, and you should get bumped back up soon enough. I like the new look; keep writing! Ben Hey Mark.

Yeah, Google can be a tricky animal sometimes. At the end of the day, however, I agree that the Google Beast feeds on quality content, so just keep feeding it (and your readers) what it wants, and you should get bumped back up soon enough.

I like the new look; keep writing!

Ben

]]> By: Daniel http://www.musclehack.com/google-slashes-musclehacks-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-15021 Daniel Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:12:49 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=662#comment-15021 got used to the old look but hey... nice new look - one thing in older browsers the template doesn't display right... IE6 etc. with regards PR, hope it gets back up soon! got used to the old look but hey… nice new look – one thing in older browsers the template doesn’t display right… IE6 etc.

with regards PR, hope it gets back up soon!

]]>