Is Diet Science Still Scientific?

What happens when a new hypothesis is put forward that contradicts another one?
It’s rigorously tested to see if it has merit, right? Wrong.

Gary TaubesYou see, sometimes diet science has a nerve even calling itself a science since it doesn’t act scientifically. Like Dr. Atkins before him Gary Taubes is fending off the critics after his new ground-breaking book ‘Good Calories, Bad Calories‘ was published.

If you’re not familiar with the book, Taubes puts forward the ‘Carbohydrate hypothesis‘ and calls for the funding to test this hypothesis against the ‘Fat hypothesis’ in an effort to ascertain which one is more effective and healthy. As a very healthy low-carber this echoes my wish too.

Fad? I Don’t Think So

For those who use the term ‘Fad Diet‘ (Lord give me strength!) to describe a controlled carbohydrate approach - put your money where your mouth is. Show support for these studies, if enough people want it, it will happen. I am very confident of the results, both for weight loss and cholesterol improvement i.e. lowering LDL levels - Low Carb will win the day.

Here’s a podcast of Gary Taubes speaking about his hypothesis on ‘Quirks & Quarks‘. About half-way through he speaks about those in the medical profession holding onto cherished beliefs even when they don’t make any sense.

Speaking about an interview Taubes had with a famous diabetes specialist who co-edited an 800 page handbook on the metabolism of fat tissue, Taubes says that virtually every chapter of this book contained the message that carbs drive insulin response and, in turn, insulin drives fat accumulation.

Taubes then puts it to this guy that this is the same as saying that carbs make you fat. If carbs drive insulin and insulin drives fat accumulation then what’s the difference between saying that and saying that carbs make us fat? While the diabetes specialist agreed with the former statement he said of the latter, “But we know what makes you fat, it’s not carbohydrates, it’s sedentary behavior.” Crazy eh?

Folks, when you believe in something that flies in the face of the evidence staring you in the face, you’ve got blind faith - NOT science.

Mark McManus

P.S. Jimmy Moore has given some great links to people who are blogging on the subject of this powerful book. They are:

Have I helped you? Please consider Stumbling or Digging this article by clicking one of the icons below. Thank You These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg

If you're new here, please download my free workout and diet book and start transforming your body today!. Thanks for visiting!

Related posts:

  1. Eat Fats, Get Skinny?
  2. Low Carb Vs Low Fat Debate Rages On
  3. Dr. Weil Gives Low Carb Diets The Thumbs Up
  4. Post-Workout Carbs - Crucial or Counter-Productive?
  5. How To Build Muscle And Lose Fat At The Same Time

You can discuss this article or anything else at the MuscleHack Bodybuilding Forum

 Subscribe in a reader

  Subscribe to comments


Thank you for reading this post. You can now Read Comments (2) or Leave A Trackback.

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 22nd, 2007 at 9:19 pm and is filed under Bodybuilding Diet, Lose Fat. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Is Diet Science Still Scientific?”

  1. MuscleHack | Eat Fats, Get Skinny? Says:

    [...] Is Diet Science Still Scientific? [...]

  2. New Guy Here - Hello! - Page 2 - Introduce Yourself Says:

    [...] was the belief 10 - 15 years ago. The dogma was, you need fat to gain fat. My belief is that the body needs carbohydrates to gain fat. Anyway, it’s a big issue. Do what you feel works best for you. PS, there’s a good podcast on the [...]

Leave a Reply

Free Bodybuilding Diet & Workout Plan Ebook!