Comments on: MuscleHack Reader Loses 13.8lbs Of Fat & Gains 6.43lbs Of Muscle http://www.musclehack.com/musclehack-reader-loses-138lbs-of-fat-gains-643lbs-of-muscle/ Build Muscle, Six Pack Abs and Lose Fat Fast. Natural BodyBuilding Blog Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:21:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: sam.d http://www.musclehack.com/musclehack-reader-loses-138lbs-of-fat-gains-643lbs-of-muscle/#comment-13239 sam.d Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:20:46 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=382#comment-13239 good work Mark & Gabriel haha red meat is cheap in nz but i cant get low carb tortilla's unless i order it from over seas and it will expire before it gets to me haha good work Mark & Gabriel haha red meat is cheap in nz but i cant get low carb tortilla’s unless i order it from over seas and it will expire before it gets to me haha

]]> By: Mark McManus http://www.musclehack.com/musclehack-reader-loses-138lbs-of-fat-gains-643lbs-of-muscle/#comment-6378 Mark McManus Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:35:42 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=382#comment-6378 I'm moving! Are the houses expensive over there? ;) I’m moving! Are the houses expensive over there? ;)

]]> By: Rafael Lopes http://www.musclehack.com/musclehack-reader-loses-138lbs-of-fat-gains-643lbs-of-muscle/#comment-6370 Rafael Lopes Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:23:19 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=382#comment-6370 Nice Gabriel. Do the MANS diet in Porto Alegre is a lot easier.Red meat is cheaper, and there are traditional churrascaria everywhere. Nice Gabriel.
Do the MANS diet in Porto Alegre is a lot easier.Red meat is cheaper, and there are traditional churrascaria everywhere.

]]> By: Ronnie http://www.musclehack.com/musclehack-reader-loses-138lbs-of-fat-gains-643lbs-of-muscle/#comment-6307 Ronnie Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:10:47 +0000 http://www.musclehack.com/?p=382#comment-6307 Great results! Congratulations to Gabriel! --- And about the new study; the first thing that bothers me, is that all three groups were advised to basically eat a vegetarian food with possibly a little fish and poultry. Even in the so called "lowcarb" group "the participants were counseled to choose vegetarian sources of fat and protein". And then just after that is says that "the diet was based on the Atkins diet". Like WTF? And to make matters worse; the participants in the "lowcarb" group were getting 40% of their calories from CH (which can hardly be called "lowcarb") as opposed to 50% form the other two diet groups. I won't even bother to comment on the co called Mediterranean diet... Well at at last they gave a somewhat positive general message to the public; lowfat isn't beneficial, neither to health nor weight loss/maintenance. Anyone interesting in reading the whole thing; here's the link: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/3/229 Great results! Congratulations to Gabriel!

—
And about the new study; the first thing that bothers me, is that all three groups were advised to basically eat a vegetarian food with possibly a little fish and poultry. Even in the so called “lowcarb” group “the participants were counseled to choose vegetarian sources of fat and protein”. And then just after that is says that “the diet was based on the Atkins diet”. Like WTF? And to make matters worse; the participants in the “lowcarb” group were getting 40% of their calories from CH (which can hardly be called “lowcarb”) as opposed to 50% form the other two diet groups. I won’t even bother to comment on the co called Mediterranean diet…
Well at at last they gave a somewhat positive general message to the public; lowfat isn’t beneficial, neither to health nor weight loss/maintenance.

Anyone interesting in reading the whole thing; here’s the link: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/3/229

]]>