Comments on: The Six Pack Calculator. Input Your Stats Now!

By: Mark McManus

Mark McManus — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:23:24 +0000

A beast is right! Your motivation is obvious man, keep it up! If any other Facebookers out there want to friend me, here I am…
https://www.facebook.com/mcmanus.mark

By: Joshua

Joshua — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:17:06 +0000

Hey Mark, Cant wait to get the new book. Calculator says 16-20 weeks. I just completed the first week, and HAD to carb up due to the cardio I told you about. I can tell though I am leaning out. MAN….Im gonna be a beast when Im done this cycle. Ill probably be 220lbs at 6’1. Ill keep you posted on Facebook. Take care!

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:27:53 +0000

The Six Pack Calculator. What a unique idea…also a great motivating tool.

By: Mark McManus

Mark McManus — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:11:42 +0000

@flabcannon. It’s not released yet. It will be out next week.
@Andras. You’re probably working your abs too often. They need to recover and grow like any other muscle. 2 or 3 intense workouts is more than enough.
Thanks Conor and BMFG.

By: Build Muscle Fast Gal

Build Muscle Fast Gal — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:57:40 +0000

What a neat creation. Will give it a try – need to go measure my neck and hips! Also, thanks for sharing the html to put on our websites. I might take you up on that, leaving, of course, all your links, etc. intact. It’s much appreciated and I think worth sharing with others!

By the way, I read your article: How Building Muscle Is Like Taking Out a Loan. It’s a great explanation. I am a woman and recently became very interested in muscle growth. That’s because I work out with Kettlebells and just started learning, from bits and pieces on the internet, about the great importance of diet and how you do your workouts and how important it is to make your workouts count so you don’t LOSE muscle instead of gaining muscle! Your article helps me explain what I do and why I do it to those who wonder why I put emphasis on muscle growth. Thanks!

By: Conor

Conor — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:55:50 +0000

Handy tool!! 3 weeks for me then!!!
bought your TSPA few months ago and it worked a treat!! look forward to the reading the new version as im nearly ready for another cut!
Cheers!

By: Andras

Andras — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:49:39 +0000

@Mark. Thank you. I do the abs training 3-4 times a week, and im sure i have abs, but i just can’t see them yet. Maybe the caliper method is wrong, and im around 11% in reality. I will not give up tho.

By: flabcannon

flabcannon — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:43:28 +0000

Hi Mark – I noticed that you said TSPA 2 is free for those who purchased the previous version. I did, but I don’t know how to download the new version. How do I go about doing this?

Thanks.

By: Mark McManus

Mark McManus — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:40:33 +0000

@Ian. Use calipers. Also, at worst your 17 days away if you diet correctly so it could be correct. Even 2 pounds of fat can severely cover up a nice six-pack.
@Andras. Congrats on the TSPA success. Are you training your abs as outlined in the program? They will build like any other muscle.
Yes you get the new version free. 🙂

By: romi

romi — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:37:32 +0000

like always great work Mark,
I hope u’ll include the 3 day schedule also in the new TSPA2…i m continuing 3.0 and now eagerly waiting for new 3 days schedule.

By: Andras

Andras — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:20:37 +0000

Hi! My best case is -1 weeks 🙂
I’m already at 9%, but i can hardly see the six pack, but i know its there 🙂
Maybe my barrier is 8%, i dont know. I started TPSA two moths ago, i got here from 15%, it is a very good reasult i think.
But know i’m stuck a bit.

Is it worth to buy the new tpsa as well? Is there an upgrade option for us who bought the old book? 😉

By: Ian

Ian — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:11:48 +0000

I got -1.5 and worst case of -2.5 but still don’t have a six pack. I’m pretty sure my body fat is right because I measure it on a machine with electric pads. Does this mean I’m close but just need to build the muscle more?

By: Mark McManus

Mark McManus — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:04:48 +0000

That’s just the way it appears in a wordpress blog. In a regular site, the fields are bigger and better looking. Try it.
Cheers.

By: Glenn

Glenn — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:47:55 +0000

Awesome idea Mark! Can you expand the size of the fields on the calculator a bit? It looks only wide enough for one character.